LGR22 Idrott och hälsa: an AI documentation pipeline
May 15, 2025
Idrott och hälsa is built on movement, motivation and pupil agency, yet the workload around it is often dominated by text: planning, adaptations, safety paperwork and assessment evidence. This article shows a practical, LGR22-ready pipeline for turning lively, pupil-led lessons into clear, auditable documentation using AI as a drafting assistant. You’ll see three worked workflows (Brännboll, orienteering, and risk assessment), plus quality gates that protect pedagogy, inclusion and accuracy. We finish with minimum-data safeguarding boundaries and copy-and-adapt templates you can use today.
KS1/KS2 Teacher-in-the-loop AI Playbook
May 13, 2025
AI can support primary teaching without becoming a pupil-facing chatbot. This playbook shows a “teacher-in-the-loop” approach for KS1/KS2, where AI stays behind the scenes as a planning and adaptation assistant. You’ll find five safe micro-routines for lesson planning, storytelling, vocabulary, feedback and SEND scaffolds, each with a ready-to-use prompt. It also includes a one-page pupil script, clear do/don’t rules, and copy-and-send parent/carer communication to keep safeguarding, privacy and trust central.
Post-exam AI Transition Studio
May 9, 2025
Post-exam time can drift into busywork or become a powerful bridge into what comes next. This ready-to-run, two-week “AI Transition Studio” gives Year 11 and Year 13 students five low-stakes project pathways: careers, research, creative portfolio, study skills, and next-step readiness. Each pathway uses tight time boxes, clear evidence-of-process expectations, and practical safeguarding scripts. You’ll also find device-light and offline variants so it works in mixed-access settings, plus templates you can copy for students and families.
Tackling the marking mountain with AI
May 6, 2025
End-of-year marking often fails not because teachers lack expertise, but because consistency is hard to maintain at speed. A moderation-first AI workflow flips the usual approach: you standardise how the rubric is interpreted before any feedback is generated, then use AI for first-pass comment batches and consistency checks across classes. Grades remain human-set, and pupil data is minimised through anonymised evidence packs and local templates. This article offers a practical, low-risk process you can roll out in a week.
Exam-Season AI Traffic Lights for Schools
May 2, 2025
Exam season is when AI rules most often unravel: different teachers say different things, students guess what’s allowed, and well-meaning support can tip into malpractice. This one-page “AI traffic-light” boundary system gives a shared language for revision, homework, coursework/NEA, controlled assessment and exams. You’ll get clear permitted/restricted/prohibited uses, quick ways to introduce the system in five minutes, ready-to-say scripts for staff, students and families, and integrity checks that work even when you can’t reliably “detect AI”.
May exam countdown: a 28-day AI revision sprint
April 29, 2025
The final 3–4 weeks before GCSE and A-Level exams are not the time for new notes, endless videos, or ‘more content’. They’re the time for precision: retrieval, error correction, and timed rehearsal. This 28-day, integrity-safe exam sprint uses AI as a revision operations system rather than a content generator. You’ll set up daily retrieval mini-sets, run a live misconception-to-fix loop through error logs, and rehearse timed papers with AI coaching only before and after. You’ll also get a light-touch teacher monitoring plan plus ready-to-use templates for students, parents, and departments.
Phase-banded AI ethics dilemmas toolkit
April 24, 2025
AI ethics can feel abstract, yet pupils meet its effects daily: recommendations, image filters, chatbots, and “too-good-to-be-true” videos. This phase-banded toolkit offers short, story-led dilemmas for Primary, KS3 and KS4, designed for tutor time, PSHE and computing without needing technical detail or real pupil data. Each scenario uses a consistent, safe discussion protocol that helps learners reason about fairness, privacy, consent, deepfakes and ownership.
One year of Sora: a classroom reality check
April 21, 2025
A year on from Sora-style video generation entering mainstream conversation, teachers are asking a practical question: what actually works in a classroom, and what still causes problems? This reality check focuses on the shifts you’ll notice most—better coherence, improved text handling, and more usable editing controls—alongside predictable failure modes like continuity glitches, broken physics, biased portrayals, and unsafe outputs. You’ll find low-stakes use cases, a media literacy sequence, safeguarding boundaries, workload-aware workflows, and a 30-day pilot plan with clear “keep/kill” criteria.
KS2 SATs: AI boundaries and revision toolkit
April 17, 2025
AI can genuinely improve Year 6 SATs preparation, but only when the boundaries are crystal clear. This guide sets out what “appropriate AI support” looks like for KS2, alongside non-negotiable integrity rules for pupils at home and teachers in school. You’ll find practical ways to use AI to generate maths retrieval practice, diagnose misconceptions, and scaffold SPaG and reading comprehension without giving answers. It also includes minimum-data safeguarding routines, low-device alternatives, and ready-to-copy prompts, plus a one-page family agreement you can adapt.
Preparing for the 10-Year Grundskola
April 15, 2025
Sweden’s move towards a 10-year grundskola is a long-runway change, but the organisational decisions it triggers will arrive sooner than many teams expect. This article offers a calm “now-to-2028” readiness checklist for school leaders and teacher teams: what to freeze, what to prototype, and what to document while Skolverket develops the new curriculum. You’ll see how small, safe AI micro-tools can translate draft texts into decisions about stages, timetables, and progression maps—without rewriting schemes of work too early.
Minimum viable inclusion stack: SEND tech update
April 14, 2025
This term-ready update brings together what’s genuinely new (and useful) in built-in accessibility across Google, Microsoft, Apple and Chromebooks, then adds a practical layer: a “minimum viable inclusion stack” you can standardise across classrooms. You’ll also find ten low-effort AI micro-routines that scaffold learning without replacing it, plus guidance on making assistive tech and AI work together rather than clash. Finally, there’s a SEND-specific procurement and safeguarding checklist, and a simple two-week pilot plan with staff briefing points and a one-page parent/carer note.
From Autocomplete to Co-authoring
April 10, 2025
In 2024–2025, AI writing tools shifted from simple autocomplete to document-aware co-authoring spaces that can draft, rewrite and reorganise whole texts on command. That change has made “did they use AI?” the wrong question for assessment. Instead, teachers need routines that capture visible decision-making: prompt logs, revision rationales, source trails and short in-class checkpoints. This guide explains the new risks (over-polish, voice drift, hidden outsourcing) and offers practical ways to redesign writing instruction so students can use AI while still producing assessable evidence of thinking, craft and integrity.
Outdoor Learning Meets AI
April 7, 2025
Spring fieldwork is at its best when pupils slow down, look closely, and record what they actually notice. Yet the pull of instant answers on a device can flatten observation into a quick photo and a guessed label. This article offers a “pocket-to-paper” routine: devices away during noticing, then AI used afterwards for cautious species suggestions, structured data logging, and accessible outputs such as audio, simplified text, and translation. It’s built around a simple safety protocol and an “AI confidence” checklist so pupils learn to verify rather than trust.
GPT-5 release day school briefing
April 3, 2025
GPT-5 will arrive with headlines, hot takes and rapid product changes, but schools need a calm, repeatable way to judge what actually matters. This release-day protocol gives you a one-page briefing and a 60–90 minute comparative “bake-off” against your current model and workflows. You’ll test planning, feedback, accessibility, safeguarding and assessment using a minimum-safe environment, then make an adopt/pilot/park decision with clear evidence thresholds. It ends with the smallest policy tweaks leaders should make in week one, plus ready-to-send staff and parent messages that avoid hype.
Term 2 AI After-Action Review Template
March 27, 2025
Term 2 often leaves schools with a trail of AI experiments: a few wins, a few worries, and lots of half-finished ideas. This 60-minute “AI After-Action Review” (AAR) is a practical retrospective that helps you turn scattered trials into 3–5 agreed Term 3 routines. It is deliberately evidence-light and focused on leading indicators you can capture quickly: time saved, learning quality, equity, integrity, and safeguarding. You’ll leave with clear keep/kill/scale decisions, named owners, and a 30-day check-in.